AGE-RELATED MACULAR DEGENERATION
UPDATE: A REVIEW OF PATHOGENESIS, CLINICAL FINDINGS, AND TREATMENT
BY
MARCO ZARBIN, MD, PhD, FACS
Supported in part by Research to Prevent
Blindness, Inc. and the New Jersey Lions Eye Research Foundation.
PAGE 4
|
Curcio CA, Millican CL, Allen KA, Kalina RE. Aging of the human
photoreceptor mosaic: evidence for selective vulnerability of
rods in central retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1993; 34:3278-96.
Del Priore LV, Kaplan HJ, Hornbeck R, Jones Z, Swinn M. Retinal
pigment epithelial debridement as a model for the pathogenesis
and treatment of macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 1996; 122:629-43.
Evans J, Wormald R. Is the incidence of registrable age-related
macular degeneration increasing? Br J Ophthalmol 1996; 80:9-14.
Frank RN. Growth factors in age-related macular degeneration:
pathogenic and therapeutic implications. Ophthalmic Res 1997;
29:341-353.
Gass JDM. Pathogenesis of disciform detachment of the neuroepithelium.
III. Senile macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol 1967; 63:617-44.
Green WR, Enger C. Age-related macular degeneration histopathologic
studies. Ophthalmology 1993; 100:1519-35.
Grossniklaus, HE, Green WR. Histopathologic and ultrastructural
findings of surgically excised choroidal neovascularization. Arch
Ophthalmol 1998; 116:745-9.
Heriot WJ, Henkind P, Belhorn RW, Burns MS. Choroidal neovascularization
can digest Bruch's membrane: a prior break is not essential. Ophthalmology
1984; 91:1603-8.
Hogan MJ. Role of the retinal pigment epithelium in macular
disease. Trans Amer Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1972; 76: 64-80.
Ishibashi T, Sorgente N, Patterson R, Ryan SJ. Pathogenesis of
drusen in the primate. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1986; 27:184-93.
Jacobson SG, Cideciyan AV, Regunath G, et al. Night blindness
in Sorsby's fundus dystrophy reversed by vitamin A. Nat Genet
1995; 11:27-32.
Karwatowski WSS, Jeffries TE, Duance VE, Albon J, Bailey AJ,
East DL. Preparation of Bruch's membrane and analysis of the age-related
changes in the structural collagens. Br J Ophthalmol 1995; 79:944-52.
Kennedy CJ, Rakoczy RE, Constable IJ. Lipofuscin of the retinal
pigment epithelium: a review. Eye 1995; 9:763-71.
Korte G, Burns M, Bellhorn R. Epithelium-capillary interactions
in the eye: the RPE and the choriocapillaris. Int Rev of Cytol
1989; 114:221-48.
Kuntz CA, Jacobson SG, Cideciyan AV, et al. Subretinal pigment
epithelial deposits in a dominant late-onset retinal degeneration.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1996; 37:1772-82.
Leonard DS, Zhang X, Panozzo G, Sugino IK, Zarbin MA. Clinicopathological
correlation of localized retinal pigment epithelium debridement.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1997; 38: 1094-109.
Loffler KU, Lee WR. Is basal laminar deposit unique for
|
general health, hypertension and hypercholesterolemia should
be managed actively, and cigarette smoking should be discouraged.
What treatments are available for
patients with AMD? There is no proven treatment
for the atrophic form of AMD. The only proven treatment for patients
who have developed CNVs is laser photocoagulation. Laser treatment
cauterizes the CNVs, and the vascular thrombosis stops subretinal
bleeding. Laser treatment also destroys the overlying retina.
As a result, each area of laser treatment is incapable of seeing,
and treatment leaves the patient with a blind spot ("scotoma")
in or near the center of vision. Still, without laser treatment,
the blind spot induced by the CNVs would be even bigger.
Among most patients with extrafoveal CNVs, laser photocoagulation
effectively delays the onset of severe, central visual loss by
about 18 months, on average. Unfortunately, only a minority (10-20%)
of patients with CNVs are eligible for laser photocoagulation.
The size of the lesion and the degree to which its boundaries
can be identified precisely with fluorescein angiography are the
factors most commonly rendering patients ineligible for laser
photocoagulation. The most common cause of treatment failure following
laser photocoagulation is recurrent CNV growth, which occurs in
half the patients.
Low vision aids can be very useful for patients with central
visual impairment. Patients with intermediate visual loss (e.g.,
visual acuity 20/40-20/80) benefit the most from a low vision
evaluation, which includes a careful refraction, demonstration
of various hand held magnifying devices, high intensity lamps
(e.g., halogen lamps), computerized text enlargers, and, in selected
centers, special video glasses that project images onto functioning
paracentral retina.
What is the risk of blindness once
a CNV develops? The risk of visual loss depends
on the size, location, and angiographic features of the CNV. In
general, the closer the CNV is to the fovea, the larger the CNV,
and the more well defined the CNV, the worse the prognosis. If
a patient has a well defined subfoveal CNV (i.e., the borders
of the CNV are well demarcated angiographically), the risk of
severe visual loss (i.e., e" 6 line loss of vision on the
visual acuity chart) is 45%, and the mean visual acuity is 20/500
at four years follow-up without treatment, vs. 23% and 20/320
among treated eyes, respectively. (Patients with visual acuity
equal to or worse than 20/200 are legally blind.) Patients with
poorly defined CNVs have a somewhat better prognosis.
What are the future directions
for research? Most efforts are directed at developing
treatments for the neovascular complications of AMD. Experimental
protocols involve treatment with antiangiogenic drugs (e.g., thalidomide),
|
photodynamic therapy (i.e., ablation of CNVs using subthermal
laser energy and photosensitizing agents with the goal of minimizing
retinal destruction), low dose radiation therapy (teletherapy,
which can reduce growth of and leakage from vascular tumors, e.g.,
choroidal hemangiomas), surgical excision of CNVs (to eliminate
the source of exudative retinal detachment and subretinal scarring),
and retinal cell transplantation therapy (to replace cells removed
iatrogenically, e.g., RPE, or lost through atrophy). Transplantation
of retinal cells in conjunction with surgical excision of abnormal
blood vessels may offer hope to many patients (even those with
"dry" AMD may benefit from RPE transplantation). Retinal cell
transplantation is a great challenge, and it will not be easy
to accomplish.
Drusen can disappear spontaneously, probably as a result of RPE
atrophy. Sarks, Sarks, and Killingsworth pointed out that geographic
atrophy in AMD is associated with loss of accumulated basal linear
deposit. They also noted that the growth of CNVs from within Bruch's
membrane into the subRPE space occurs in areas of basal linear
deposit, possibly because: 1) there is true cleavage plane between
the RPE and Bruch's membrane in these loci, and 2) in these areas
the outer retina and RPE are under greatest metabolic distress
and stimulate CNV growth. Thus, elimination of soft drusen might
eliminate basal linear deposit and reduce the risk of exudative
maculopathy in AMD.
Disappearance of drusen in areas adjacent to sites of laser photocoagulation
was first noted by Gass in 1973. Several reports have confirmed
these findings. Laser photocoagulation-induced drusen regression
might prevent CNV development. While this approach to CNV prophylaxis
may hold promise, one study has shown an increased risk of developing
CNVs among some eyes undergoing light laser photocoagulation to
induce drusen regression. A multicenter study to assess the ability
of low energy laser photocoagulation to induce drusen regression
and prevent CNV development is now being organized.
REFERENCES
Allikmets R, Shroyer NF, Singh N et al. Mutation on the Stargardt
disease gene (ABCR) in age-related macular degeneration. Science
1997; 277:1805-7.
Bird AC. Pathogenesis of retinal pigment epithelial detachment
in the elderly; the relevance of Bruch's membrane change. Eye
1991; 5:1-12.
Bird AC. What is the future of research in age-related macular
degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol 1997; 115:1311-3.
Bressler NM, Silva JC, Bressler SB, Fine SL, Green WR. Clinicopathologic
correlation of drusen and retinal pigment epithelial abnormalities
in age-related macular degeneration. Retina 1994; 14:130-42.
Burns RP, Feeney-Burns L. Clinicomorphologic correlations of
drusen and Bruch's membrane. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1980; 78:206-23.
|